Low-poly wooden figure typing at a computer, symbolizing video game creation

Fan Games and Legal Risks: What Developers Should Know

Fan games are a beloved part of anime and gaming culture. Often created by passionate fans who want to expand on a favorite series, these projects can range from small mods and visual novels to fully developed games inspired by an existing franchise. While these works are usually created as tributes, they raise difficult questions for the developers who actually own the underlying intellectual property (IP).

Fan games exist in a legally complex space. For developers, encountering a fan game based on their own IP can be both flattering and concerning. On one hand, it signals that a community is deeply engaged with the work. On the other, it presents legal and business challenges that cannot be ignored.

What Is a Fan Game?

A fan game is an unofficial video game project based on or inspired by an existing franchise, character, or story. Developers often pour hundreds of hours into these works, blending original art and code with recognizable names, logos, and likenesses from the source material.

Because they rely on copyrighted elements, fan games exist in a legal gray area. Rights holders have exclusive control over derivative works, which means fan projects, even if noncommercial, are typically infringing. This tension has played out many times in high-profile cases:

  • Pokémon Uranium, a full-length fan-made Pokémon RPG with more than 150 original species, was removed after a DMCA notice from Nintendo.
  • AM2R (Another Metroid 2 Remake), a polished reimagining of Metroid II, received widespread praise before Nintendo issued a takedown.
  • Mother 4, originally envisioned as a continuation of the Mother/Earthbound series, was rebranded as Oddity, an original IP project, to avoid legal conflict.

These examples highlight both the passion of fans and the reality that rights holders often enforce their ownership.

IP Considerations for Developers

When a fan game appears, the first step for a developer is to understand the scope of their rights. Most original games include multiple layers of protection:

  • Copyright protects the code, characters, story, dialogue, art, and music.
  • Trademarks cover names, logos, and symbols associated with the game.
  • Patents may apply in limited cases, such as novel game mechanics.

Any fan project that uses these elements without permission may infringe, regardless of whether it is distributed for free.

Balancing Creativity with Protection

Some developers choose to embrace fan creations, seeing them as valuable community engagement. Others view them as threats to brand integrity or future business opportunities. The right approach depends on the goals and tolerance of the rights holder.

Possible considerations include:

  • Brand Control: Allowing unauthorized works to spread may weaken control over how the brand is presented.
  • Market Impact: Even free projects may compete with official games or future sequels.
  • Community Relations: Heavy-handed enforcement can alienate fans, while selective tolerance can foster goodwill.

The challenge is finding a balance between encouraging community creativity and preserving long-term rights.

Responding to Fan Games

Developers have several options when deciding how to respond:

  • Takedown Notices (DMCA): A formal request to remove infringing material from websites or platforms.
  • Cease-and-Desist Letters: Direct communication with the fan team to stop development or distribution.
  • Licensing Agreements: In rare cases, a developer may license rights to allow a fan project to proceed under defined terms.
  • Silence/Selective Tolerance: Choosing not to act, particularly if the project is small-scale and noncommercial, though this carries some risk of setting expectations.

Each response has both legal and reputational implications. The main takeaway is that consistency is key: tolerating some projects but cracking down on others can create confusion or backlash.

Fair Use Questions

Some fans argue that their projects qualify as “fair use.” In U.S. law, however, fair use is not permission granted in advance; it is a defense raised after infringement is alleged. In other words, fair use only comes into play once a dispute has already escalated into a legal challenge. At that stage, the rights holder has claimed infringement, and the fan game developer is left trying to justify the work in court.

Courts typically weigh four factors when deciding fair use:

  • Purpose and character of the use: whether the new work is transformative (adding new meaning or expression) or primarily a substitute for the original.
  • Nature of the copyrighted work: whether the underlying work is creative and fictional (which receives stronger protection) or more factual.
  • Amount and substantiality: how much of the original work was taken, and whether the “heart” of the work was used.
  • Effect on the market: whether the new work competes with or harms the market for the original.

Because fan games often copy characters, settings, music, and other substantial parts of the original, fair use arguments are rarely successful. Even if a fan project might arguably qualify, the legal costs and uncertainty of litigation make this a steep and risky battle.

What About Folks Who Want to Make a Fan Game?!

The passion behind fan games is undeniable, and many creators use these projects as learning experiences or portfolio pieces. However, developers of original games should recognize that well-meaning fans often underestimate the risks.

For those considering making a fan game:

  • Understand the Risks: Even free distribution can be subject to takedowns.
  • Consider Original IP: Rebranding a project, as the creators of Mother 4 did, may avoid conflict while preserving creative work.
  • Engage Respectfully: Some rights holders are open to mods or fan content under specific guidelines, but this varies widely.

For original developers, communicating clear policies about fan works can help set expectations and reduce disputes. Welcoming mods, restricting use, or offering limited licenses are some examples of how original developers can balance creativity with IP rights.

Final Thoughts

Fan games showcase the deep admiration and creativity of anime and gaming communities. For developers, they also highlight the importance of protecting intellectual property while maintaining strong community relationships. By understanding IP rights, evaluating fair use claims realistically, and choosing a consistent approach to enforcement, developers can protect their creations while respecting the passion of their fans. Odin Law & Media helps navigate these complexities so creative work can stay protected.

Veda Cruz

Veda Cruz is a video game lawyer, educator, and indie developer. She represents studios and creators across the games industry and teaches video game law and business at the University of Miami. She can be reached at veda at odin law dot com.

Contact Us

Address:

4208 Six Forks Rd.
STE 1000
Raleigh, NC 27609

Phone:

(919) 813-0090

Email:

[email protected]